Asus TP501UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TP501UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP501UAK
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 18:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 148
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 248
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 378 398 396 350 384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 429
Write 301
Mixed 244
SusWrite 378
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 28.2
94% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 275
220% 311 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GB
2133, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP501UAK Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP501UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback