Asus Z87-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-K  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130902
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 13:52
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 85
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 350
45% 342 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 870F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 169
Parallax 180
148% 177 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
130% 164 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 71 79 77 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43% Average
Read 114
Write 81.2
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 68.9
20% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 88
71% 100 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 73%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
101GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 286 373 401 415 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 332
Write 389
Mixed 326
SusWrite 357
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 44.4
141% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 158
168% 280 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 125%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 300 393 426 441 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 418
Mixed 385
SusWrite 378
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 43.5
140% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 355
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 10,093
Mixed 80.1
3,638% 5,086 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-K Builds (Compare 2,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Z87-K - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $412
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback