HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 250 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EE
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 24 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 144
57% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 201
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 81EE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6518
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 240GB 240GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 29 45 18 24 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 417
Write 323
Mixed 299
SusWrite 54.3
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 19.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
13% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback