Positivo VJF155F11X-B3611B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo VJF155F11X-B3611B  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo N250WU-V
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '22 at 22:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 132
51% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 387
36% 301 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Clevo(1558 2410) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Sc10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 180 72 62 66 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.6% Average
Read 255
Write 221
Mixed 200
SusWrite 113
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 13.4
55% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 160
144% 214 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 95%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
9GB free, PID cb25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 10 8.4 9.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 153
Write 6.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 9.6
42% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IWGKSEG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJF155F11X-B3611B Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF155F11X-B3611B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback