Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateOct 24 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 310
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 841
91% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 84.3
76% 89.2 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 80.9
Splatting 72.3
71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Delora D2 SSD 120GB
28GB free
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 9.9 39 27 32 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 497
Write 413
Mixed 349
SusWrite 76.1
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 1.1
57% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 80.6
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
13% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 68%
WDC WDS250G2B0B 250GB
176GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 195 199 197 194 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 382
SusWrite 214
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 50.3
180% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 286
204% 255 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 128 129 127 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 113
SusWrite 128
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 1
72% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 39%
SHGP31-1000GM 1TB
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41062C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2602 1770 1439 1439 1435 1444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,830
Write 2,666
Mixed 1,773
SusWrite 1,688
502% 2,239 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 92.1
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1,094
837% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 366%
Great: 433%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 169 170 179 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 165
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 174
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
289% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 29.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 MSI30A2 MSI MP271
Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback