MSI X370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A33
MotherboardMSI X370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A33)  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170731
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 19:21
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 190
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 718
64% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,265
78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 158
Parallax 147
99% 142 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 141
Splatting 116
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 481
Write 330
Mixed 337
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 12.5
79% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 25.5
29% 48 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
95GB free
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 469
Write 340
Mixed 337
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 23.8
95% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 40.1
47% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
867GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 130
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.21
66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93%
Great: 114%
Lexar WorkflowSR2 256GB
144GB free, PID ba06
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 93.2
Write 85.6
Mixed 86
112% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 3.33
4K Mixed 2.15
225% 5.28 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB
128GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 59.8
Mixed 55.9
74% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.35
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 23
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback