Lenovo 3209N6M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3209N6M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 05:13
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 136
44% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 85.3
8-Core 97.4
12% 91.4 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 433 400 408 407 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 426
Mixed 371
SusWrite 413
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 29.6
128% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 129
138% 233 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
0GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 130 129 130 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 121
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 130
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3209N6M Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209N6M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback