Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A263 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '22 at 14:07
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	97%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1005M 3,385 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 45.1 2-Core 84.7 40% 63 Pts	4-Core 86.6 8-Core 86.8 12% 86.7 Pts	64-Core 84.1 5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4304RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 103 133 134 136 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 345 Write 309 Mixed 248 SusWrite 141 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 8.3 39% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 31.6 42% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 8 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 1005MIntelBench 44%, 3,385 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	3x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
WD120G 120GBBench 57%, 39 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBUnknownBench 36%, 204 samples	2x
FSFF65F-D8KQ9 HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBKingmaxBench 35%, 2 samples	1x