Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 04:49
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 803
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 1321 1317 1282 1262 1328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 1,339
Mixed 919
SusWrite 1,297
279% 1,239 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 80.9
267% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 310
390% 692 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 258%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 184 185 192 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 136
Write 160
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 184
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
69% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45
104GB free
Firmware: FB4OC4FC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 41.8
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 31.5
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24%
Great: 34%
Toshiba MK2575GSX 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: GT001Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 63.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 69.2
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 42%
WD WD1600BEAS-00RRT0 160GB
70GB free
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 28 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 37.4
Mixed 26
SusWrite 27.6
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 37.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 34
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback