Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6226
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 183
59% 109 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 344
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000P-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 13FC) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 473.81
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 107GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 82 82 106 132 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 200
Write 46.2
Mixed 111
SusWrite 100
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3
514% 3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x10GB
1 of 1 slots used
10GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback