Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 14:58
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 271
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 830
83% 674 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid TEAM TM8FP4512G 512GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,160
Write 2,081
Mixed 1,205
334% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 50.4
159% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 363
327% 469 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 153%
Amd-raid Netac NVMe SSD 1 1TB
519GB free
Firmware: T091 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 735 574 579 542 575 573 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
134% Outstanding
Read 856
Write 1,450
Mixed 872
SusWrite 596
214% 944 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 23.2
142% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 187
237% 398 MB/s
Amd-raid Array 1 499GB
134GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 594 596 585 593 593 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 842
Write 874
Mixed 637
SusWrite 623
167% 744 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 37.8
141% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 222
184% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 128%
Great: 308%
Amd-raid WDC WD30EFRX-68A 3TB
645GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 85 85 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
Read 73
Write 78.3
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 84.3
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 37.8
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 33.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback