MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 13:01
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 8.26
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 176
45% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 691
62% 526 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 95%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BTO 512G NGFF SSD 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW2O1219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 317 337 321 283 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48% Average
Read 204
Write 192
Mixed 175
SusWrite 318
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 6.7
43% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 19.8
59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48%
Great: 83%
Micron Crucial X8 SSD 1TB
203GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 31.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 36.1
7% 32 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 6.3
26% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
713GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 169 169 180 173 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 171
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 173
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 12.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 420
10% 420 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 1,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback