ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FAC
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '22 at 10:34
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110U 11,481 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 176 63% 113 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 238 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1B12) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 6 4% 4.33 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 9.1 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0SA6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 606 611 292 270 280 266 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 744 Write 815 Mixed 769 SusWrite 388 153% 679 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 46.3 165% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 552 DQ Write 365 DQ Mixed 444 335% 454 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 193%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 368GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 61 Write 70.9 Mixed 31.8 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 61%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 297GB free Firmware: 0214 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 96.8 Write 93.2 Mixed 70.5 65% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 100GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 24.2 Write 17.9 Mixed 22 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 82% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB 9,575 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.9% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.3 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	9x

SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples	6x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	2x

RAM
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	7x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Transcend JM2666HSB-8G 12GBHynixBench 58%, 8 samples	1x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 8GBHynixBench 59%, 22 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback