Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T5500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0D883F
Memory67.2 GB free of 72 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 10:19
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 718
64% 539 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 137
Parallax 124
94% 125 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 106
Splatting 117
105% 131 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 931 926 931 929 931 924 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,189
Write 949
Mixed 681
SusWrite 929
210% 937 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 37.4
124% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 415
314% 422 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 162%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
737GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 448 450 451 451 447 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 442
Mixed 430
SusWrite 449
100% 441 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 34
110% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
635GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 178 174 179 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 174
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$24
419GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 178 177 177 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 170
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 177
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
84GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 92.5
Write 96.1
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 62.8
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9x8GB
9 of 9 slots used
72GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 25.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T5500 Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T5500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback