Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '22 at 06:46
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 127 56% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 375 39% 312 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Device(1B4C 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)	52.7% Above average	Lighting 65.1 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 61.3 53% 64.2 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 65 Splatting 61 52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: M310 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 91 89 84 83 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 444 Write 98.8 Mixed 169 SusWrite 86.8 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 3.2 30% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 95%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB 11,576 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 159GB free Firmware: 90000Q00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 355 341 381 369 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 461 Write 382 Mixed 382 SusWrite 350 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 31.8 106% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 239 176% 233 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 265GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 359 383 399 406 401 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 365 Mixed 367 SusWrite 373 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 44.4 143% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 239 176% 232 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16