Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive402% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 358
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 709
8-Core 1,392
124% 1,050 Pts
64-Core 2,617
162% 2,617 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3086 1916 1812 1816 1811 1811 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 2,753
Write 3,284
Mixed 2,958
SusWrite 2,042
623% 2,759 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 100
327% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,691
DQ Write 1,257
DQ Mixed 1,399
1,066% 1,449 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 402%
Great: 526%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
140GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 448 447 434 428 424 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 449
Mixed 444
SusWrite 438
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 58.3
191% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 206
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3052 3042 3059 3041 3039 3139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2,926
Write 3,340
Mixed 3,009
SusWrite 3,062
697% 3,084 MB/s
4K Read 73.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 104
337% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,828
DQ Write 1,433
DQ Mixed 1,588
1,200% 1,616 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 482%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G36C16U4R.M8FB1 BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 BL16G36C16U4R.M8FB1 BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 64GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 57.8
MC Write 46
MC Mixed 46.3
143% 50 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 43.9
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 108%
This bench: 134%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback