Apple iMac20,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemApple iMac20,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AF89B6D9451A490B
Memory26.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 22:53
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 289
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 729
81% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,254
78% 1,254 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Apple(106B 021B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.5% Good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 92.5
Parallax 0.2
72% 60.2 fps
MRender 82.5
Gravity 106
Splatting 59.8
66% 82.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 86%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 104 111 101 121 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 121
Mixed 114
SusWrite 109
22% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 23.5
39% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 150
108% 141 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E3 8C26 TIMETEC-SD4-2666 8C26 TIMETEC-SD4-2666 40GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 14
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac20,2 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Apple iMac20,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback