Asus PRIME B560M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-K  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '22 at 18:11
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 749
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 216
Parallax 0.2
143% 131 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 138
Splatting 121
119% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 186 140 94 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 399
SusWrite 130
75% 342 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 25
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 50.3
69% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 99%
Patriot P210 1TB
798GB free
Firmware: U0121A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 405 375 410 408 413 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 494
Write 414
Mixed 421
SusWrite 404
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 19.8
95% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 34.9
53% 103 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD48G266681 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 26.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B560M-K Builds (Compare 2,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback