| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus EX-H110M-V3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170214 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 19 '22 at 14:58 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.8%
Good
|
75% 132 Pts
|
38% 298 Pts
|
21% 338 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
30% 38 fps
|
27% 33.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SA400S37/240GB 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 212 314 320 126 44 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
63% 282 MB/s
|
70% 22.6 MB/s
|
46% 78.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
853GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 149 177 185 187 189 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
109% 149 MB/s
|
141% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown D4H8GL30A8TXV5 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.2%
Good
|
68% 23.7 GB/s
|
54% 18.7 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EX-H110M-V3 Builds (Compare 30 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus EX-H110M-V3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 5x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 5x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 3x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $336 |