Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220824
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 19 '22 at 10:38
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$280
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 210
2-Core 411
121% 233 Pts
4-Core 824
8-Core 1,529
141% 1,177 Pts
64-Core 2899
179% 2899 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 188
Parallax 181
142% 181 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 183
Splatting 123
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PCIe SSD 512GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMB0.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 609 300 261 309 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,323
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 373
273% 1,212 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 84.4
310% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1116
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 890
662% 887 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 211%
Great: 242%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 16TB
12.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 264 281 292 272 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 104
Write 205
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 278
120% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1
294% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 110%
Great: 285%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 16TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 326 316 329 328 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 73.1
Write 209
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 326
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.7
250% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 115%
Great: 285%
G-raid Thunderbolt 3 24TB
9TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 384 379 380 385 380 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 352
Write 339
Mixed 296
SusWrite 380
253% 342 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 3.9
2,005% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 213%
Great: 229%
G-raid Thunderbolt 3 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 245 241 234 244 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 207
Mixed 204
SusWrite 236
159% 214 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 2.8
1,813% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 131%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 68.3
MC Write 71.6
MC Mixed 65.7
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 32.6
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 129%
This bench: 174%
Great: 192%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 265%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,095
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback