PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Itautec Infoway SM-3330 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Itautec SM 3330B |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110607 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 18 '22 at 23:26 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X2 550
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 82 244 272 334 351 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X2 565AMD $200Bench 48%, 383 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X2 550AMDBench 46%, 3,836 samples | 4x |
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples | 10x |
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $200 |