Samsung Q470C/500P4C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemSamsung Q470C/500P4C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP500P4C-AD1BR
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 16:20
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 74
2-Core 139
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 340
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C650) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 54 55 46 55 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 208
Write 54.8
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 51.2
22% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 7.1
51% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
114GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston termiter5.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q470C/500P4C Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Q470C/500P4C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback