Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 15:49
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 132
57% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 383
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 146
Parallax 133
110% 138 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 147
Splatting 123
106% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 390
Write 357
Mixed 288
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 20.7
69% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 156
144% 220 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 89%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
601GB free
Firmware: 0002DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 109 108 109 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 104
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
316GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 114 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 108
Write 117
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 111
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
WD WD1004FBYZ-01YCBB1 1TB
173GB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 109 108 109 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 217
Mixed 112
SusWrite 105
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
349% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
933GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 64 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 61
Write 44.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 61.9
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
236GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 78.7
Write 80.7
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 73.3
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2133C11D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback