Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3537U 17,065 User benchmarks, average bench 52% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46% Average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 87.2 45% 69.4 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 154 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sony(104D 90B8) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.74% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.7 3% 3.03 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.74% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 81 34 30 27 27 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 281 Write 239 Mixed 210 SusWrite 63.9 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 6.5 32% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 78.9 DQ Mixed 13.3 32% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.1 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples	12x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	10x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	2x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
SSD 240GB240gBench 67%, 183 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16