Lenovo 20UJ0016MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20UJ0016MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20UJ0016MX
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 11:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 186
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 581
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 719
44% 719 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Renoir Graphics D1
Legend(17AA 5082) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.9.2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 15.6
8% 12.1 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 13.8
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNI-L2B0B 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11710C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 559 358 375 387 388 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 818
Write 1,011
Mixed 819
SusWrite 411
172% 765 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 38.6
129% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 358
222% 248 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20UJ0016MX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20UJ0016MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback