Lenovo 20QNS00Q00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20QNS00Q00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QNS00Q00
Memory9.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220708
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 06:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 501
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 2297) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 8
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro T1000
Legend(17AA 2297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.6% Below average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 40.5
40% 44.2 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 41.4
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF256G8L 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L15P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 271 146 248 277 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,048
Write 1,010
Mixed 989
SusWrite 285
238% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 71.1
233% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 615
464% 630 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 200%
Great: 236%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
138GB free
Firmware: JU000D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 113 103 119 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 101
Write 27
Mixed 5
SusWrite 110
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
322% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 Kingston 9905711-052.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Kingston 9905711-052.A00G 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 25.9
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20QNS00Q00 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 20QNS00Q00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback