Lenovo 82JH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82JH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 02:50
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 64.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 308
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,018
98% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 164
Parallax 11.4
8% 61.8 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 814 810 790 794 803 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,330
Write 2,111
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 817
394% 1,760 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 86.3
294% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 984
731% 968 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 277%
Great: 296%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
453GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2338 2332 2337 2349 2333 805 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 2,345
Mixed 2,216
SusWrite 2,082
482% 2,126 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 72.4
233% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,076
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 1,077
805% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 322%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc M4S32S682LJJJ43-12 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 17.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JH Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback