Lenovo 0606CT6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 0606CT6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 21:15
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 170
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 460
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 280
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 33
Parallax 50.3
31% 40.5 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 22.7
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 134 103 8.4 8.1 8.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 421
Write 248
Mixed 304
SusWrite 102
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 211
178% 256 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 111 109 110 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 78.4
Write 71.3
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 109
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 67%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
1GB free
Firmware: A3EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65.4
Write 74.4
Mixed 39.4
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
232GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 128 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 128
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
2GB free
Firmware: 1D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.9
Write 60.7
Mixed 60.1
47% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.5 6.8 6 6.7 6.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 103
Write 8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.4
24% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
71% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0- M378B5273CH0- M378B5273CH0- M378B5273CH0- M378B5273DH0- M378B5273DH0- M378B5273DH0- M378B5273DH0- 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 29.8
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 0606CT6 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 0606CT6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback