bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6132
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 162
54% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 452
50% 393 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX8000P-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 1415) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 277 288 291 295 293 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
65GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 172 182 200 204 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 405
Write 303
Mixed 360
SusWrite 191
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 10.7
43% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 296
225% 304 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback