Lenovo 81NC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81NC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 30.9
1-Core 68
2-Core 124
40% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 364
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.36
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 500GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1.4.1S Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1464 1351 925 327 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,208
Write 1,554
Mixed 1,256
SusWrite 961
281% 1,245 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 38.9
138% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 477
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 203
198% 320 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 166%
Great: 319%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
288GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 83 87 86 87 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
202GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 55.3
Write 29.4
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 32.3
45% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81NC Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback