HP h8-1017c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP h8-1017c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AC2
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '22 at 11:10
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 174
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 367
42% 327 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Device(1B0A 909E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.7
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.4
4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 120GB SATA SSD 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0218A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 224 173 133 127 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.2% Above average
Read 254
Write 230
Mixed 233
SusWrite 165
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 20.1
93% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 32.1
54% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 91%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 96 98 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 82.6
Write 84.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 96.4
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1017c Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1017c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback