Gigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 11:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 106
38% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 183
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.8
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 948
Write 14.8
Mixed 257
86% 407 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 22.3
85% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 47.8
78% 153 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZGLKDP-00 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback