ECS A880GM-A3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardECS A880GM-A3  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 92.1
48% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04D3) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 32.1
20% 27.2 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 23.5
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 38 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 52.3
Write 53
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 39.7
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair VS2GB1333D3 VS2GB1333D3 VS2GB1333D4 VS2GB1333D4 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880GM-A3 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A880GM-A3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback