Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 20:31
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$149
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 129
61% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 347
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 13.1
12% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
65GB free
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 126 47 45 47 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 228
Write 222
Mixed 209
SusWrite 75.9
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 32.8
107% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 43.7
37% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 99 110 99 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 112
Write 119
Mixed 52
SusWrite 97.7
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 187 187 181 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 113
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 179
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 106%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
239GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 122 124 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 104
Write 96.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 121
64% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 107%
WD WD5000AAJB-00YRA0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 67 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 73.8
Write 53.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 65.3
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback