Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 05:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 234
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 619
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2321) 2GB
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 36.4
Parallax 44.6
27% 38.1 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 25.3
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF180A4 180GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 42 41 30 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 332
Write 33.2
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 37.8
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 9.87 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 81%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 80 75 79 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 71.6
Write 66.4
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 79.2
42% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C9-8GTX 0420 F3-2133C10-8GXM 0420 F3-2133C9-8GTX 0420 F3-2133C10-8GXM 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 25.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback