Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 109 2-Core 185 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 516 56% 443 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 84%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,995 Write 5,643 Mixed 6,179 1,328% 5,939 MB/s	4K Read 363 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 178 873% 240 MB/s	DQ Read 853 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 555 424% 588 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Walram 1 28GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 115GB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 347 318 333 350 346 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.3% Above average	Read 344 Write 320 Mixed 292 SusWrite 339 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 9.3 54% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 15.5 40% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 307GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 179 173 175 172 170 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 166 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 175 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC DDR4 PC 8G 2400 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.9% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 19.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16