Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J3710 2,453 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Memory 32 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 46.5 21% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 58.6 8-Core 74.3 8% 66.4 Pts	64-Core 76.2 5% 76.2 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 81BB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 3.4 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$159 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 235 351 368 389 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 415 Write 432 Mixed 386 SusWrite 345 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 30.3 100% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 139 104% 139 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB 4,853 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J3710IntelBench 27%, 2,453 samples	20x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	20x

SSD
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TBBench 98%, 11,576 samples	2x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 4,113 samples	1x

RAM
HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 16%, 5,684 samples	5x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16