HP Desktop 460-p274

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop 460-p274  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 19:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 494
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 79
46% 65.9 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 46.8
46% 57.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 383 116 104 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 457
Write 182
Mixed 367
SusWrite 195
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 31.6
122% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 219
186% 270 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop 460-p274 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop 460-p274

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback