Gigabyte GA-Z87M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130516
Uptime16.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 262
38% 276 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 16.1
14% 16.8 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 434 424 450 432 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 417
Mixed 370
SusWrite 416
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 41.6
136% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 283
224% 312 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87M-D3H Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87M-D3H - $111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback