Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 215%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 17:15
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 137
2-Core 250
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 674
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Gigabyte(1458 40A7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Lighting 361
Reflection 327
Parallax 403
294% 363 fps
MRender 402
Gravity 330
Splatting 219
248% 317 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 243%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,794
Write 1,171
Mixed 608
262% 1,191 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 45.3
179% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,035
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 557
506% 778 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
195GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1738 1567 1583 1616 1514 1278 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 2,090
Mixed 1,757
SusWrite 1,549
436% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 73.6
234% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,085
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 950
697% 920 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 304%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3536 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 34.9
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 46.3
SC Mixed 32.5
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback