Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive484% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 181
2-Core 359
113% 212 Pts
4-Core 698
8-Core 1,374
123% 1,036 Pts
64-Core 3,124
193% 3,124 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Dell(1028 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2761 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 160
Parallax 148
121% 152 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 151
Splatting 132
112% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4601 4743 4744 4766 4731 4657 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 268
Write 319
Mixed 2,596
SusWrite 4,707
456% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 106
386% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,661
DQ Write 1,369
DQ Mixed 1,538
1,145% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 484%
Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston XK2M26-MIE-NX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 65
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 40.7
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 32.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 41.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 135%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,533
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback