Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X11DPi-N(T)  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPi-N
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 14:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5120
CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 159
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 628
56% 471 Pts
64-Core 2,947
182% 2,947 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000
Nvidia(10DE 14AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 220
Parallax 138
128% 172 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 140
Splatting 139
120% 147 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 120%
Great: 137%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256-G2 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 102 84 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 470
Write 177
Mixed 245
SusWrite 124
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 24.8
102% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 180
141% 197 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 17.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X11DPi-N(T) Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Supermicro X11DPi-N(T)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback