Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory123 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration342 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 65.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 1,022
91% 771 Pts
64-Core 2427
150% 2427 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q3
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 196
107% 156 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 149
Splatting 94.9
97% 121 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 454 453 456 457 376 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 424
Mixed 364
SusWrite 439
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 33.7
115% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 282
223% 308 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 125%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
931GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2019 1725 1729 1729 1725 1737 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,014
Write 2,271
Mixed 1,852
SusWrite 1,777
446% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 69.5
235% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 937
694% 925 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 303%
Great: 347%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 307 308 307 307 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,450
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 477
317% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 73.1
246% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 945
688% 897 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 243%
Great: 280%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 436 396 397 396 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 477
Mixed 391
SusWrite 416
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 44.1
150% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 287
234% 333 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 476 476 475 475 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 470
Mixed 387
SusWrite 475
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 44.2
150% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 257
219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 124 123 125 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 119
Mixed 88
SusWrite 123
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 143 142 141 143 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 141
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 64
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 61.3
182% 63.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 160%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,030
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback