Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 125 54% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 195 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 082E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.13% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 5.5 0% 2.57 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.13% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 672GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 47 37 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 53.7 Write 44.2 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 41.9 30% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GB 3,225 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.9% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	7x
GTX 760MNvidiaBench 11%, 1,775 samples	2x

SSD
240GB SATA SSD 240GBPNYBench 71%, 495 samples	3x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	1x
NS100 512GBLexarBench 86%, 639 samples	1x

RAM
1600 4G Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GBDDR3Bench 48%, 3 samples	3x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 45%, 3,225 samples	2x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	2x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39