Gigabyte GA-H410M H V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M H V3  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '22 at 15:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 724
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.4% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 64.6
57% 68.7 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 62.3
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C-240M 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 56 26 63 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 534
Write 38.5
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 51.5
36% 172 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 1.1
45% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 89.6
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 1.7
20% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST31000528AS 3 1TB
151GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
29% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 50.4
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 58.3
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2727 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M H V3 Builds (Compare 4,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M H V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback