Anbernic Win600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAnbernic Win600  (all builds)
MotherboardAnbernic 6Q14DRW80
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display720 x 1280 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '22 at 23:58
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 130
51% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 122
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.9.2
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.7
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-512 512GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN3060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 38 30 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 341
Write 51.2
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 44.1
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 14.5
57% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 71.7
61% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Win600 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Anbernic Win600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback