Asus T302CHI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus T302CHI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T302CHI
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160614
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 10 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-6Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 44
2-Core 75.1
38% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 107
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1120) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000AU 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 48 54 49 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 298
Write 118
Mixed 120
SusWrite 51.9
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 11.2
40% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 29.8
DQ Mixed 46.9
48% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNN8PTBLBR-NUD 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical T302CHI Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus T302CHI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback