Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 69.7 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 127 54% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 178 24% 176 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M 7,774 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB69) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 1.4 4% 4.13 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 182 175 229 299 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 398 Write 82 Mixed 308 SusWrite 230 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 32 4K Mixed 20.7 69% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 156 122% 174 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13.8 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	16x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	14x

SSD
Blue 500GBWD $87Bench 86%, 19,345 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
TSB1600D3S11ELD/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 304 samples	4x
TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 471 samples	4x
CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,208 samples	2x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $157

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16