Anbernic Win600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAnbernic Win600  (all builds)
MotherboardAnbernic 6Q14DRW80
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display720 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220519
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 129
50% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 187
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.6
4% 6.73 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.1
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gloway YCT256GS3-M.2/42 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN8413A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 273 276 281 290 288 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70% Good
Read 418
Write 282
Mixed 321
SusWrite 280
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 27.3
94% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 156
117% 158 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WAR4S2666D19081C 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Win600 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Anbernic Win600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback