Lenovo CFL_____

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo CFL_____  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LVA/LVB
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 09:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 203
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 289
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3832) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 11
Parallax 6.5
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0104AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 614 620 491 212 217 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 871
Write 677
Mixed 739
SusWrite 395
150% 671 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 61
206% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 482
418% 625 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 154%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16LY-075:E Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CFL_____ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo CFL_____

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback